![]() Why turns Freemont the TV off in the middle of a football match?.But there are still some questions that need debate in my opinion: It’s actually refreshing to have a bad guy coming straight to the point, not talking his opponent to death but actually shooting him the second he got what he wanted. Now Burke arranged the scene of the crime to make it look like he had been attacked by Freemont. ![]() Regardless Harris and Gideon were sent to search the house. Burke asked for backups of the files but again Freemont said there weren’t any. ![]() At least the cops were clever enough to take the laptop with them. This probably was only done for effect because the hard drive would have certainly survived. Harris got Burke the laptop and after surveying the photographs, they shoot the laptop. But Burke got to know about them, so he went to Freemont’s house for two reasons: getting the evidence, so his drug business won’t discovered, and getting rid of Freemont, so he can take the laurels for getting him.įreemont first tried to play innocent but as soon as he was shot into his left knee, he remembered about the files and told Burke where he would find them. But Freemont didn’t want to trust Burke, so he got some evidence of incriminating pictures behind his back. So Burke, the police officer, together with his cop entourage and Freemont, the drug dealer, had an agreement about their business. Burke surprises Freemont and comes soon enough to the point about why he’s there. The movie starts with Tyler Burke arriving together with two of his cop colleagues Gideon (Daniel Cudmore) and Harris (Ty Olsson) at the house of drug dealer George Freemont (Matthew Harrison). ![]() We get straight to the point about who’s the bad guyīurke lets Freemont know that he makes the rules because he’s got the badge. He’s very smart though but didn’t really get the chance to show his talent because he doesn’t force himself to the front row to get noticed – quite the opposite to Burke. He’s introvert and no-one really takes notice of him or takes him seriously. He’s a rather quiet cop who just wants to do his job as best as he can. He is the kind of police officer who acts after the law and doesn’t make up any rules by himself. But things changed over the years because Shaw wanted to serve the badge and the people. Everyone still seems to blame Shaw for the death of the young police officer, even though he was cleared completely.īoth Shaw and Burke once came through the police academy together and actually were close friends. He’s very extrovert, very proud about himself and he doesn’t care about killing people that stand in his way.ĭean Ambrose as John Shaw Good cop John Shaw (Dean Ambrose) on the other side just returns to duty from his seven months break for psychiatric treatment following his rookie cop partner Ray Jones’ death. He rules over his group of crooked cops in quite some arrogant fashion. Tyler Burke himself is your so-called alpha man. So they can make and bend the rules to their own advantage to achieve big cars and big money. They don’t serve the police badge they make the police badge serve for them. Roger Cross as Tyler Burke First appearing in the movie we have antagonist and bad cop Tyler Burke (Roger Cross) who is the leader of a group of police officers that think that wearing a police badge make them rule in town. Since this movie has got the classic scenario Good Cop -vs- Bad Cop, it might be useful to say a few words about the characters of the protagonist and the antagonist of 12 Rounds 3: Lockdown. And if you don’t enjoy the movie, don’t make “because John Cena isn’t part of it” your sole reason. If you enjoyed the movie, don’t make anyone change your opinion. ![]() So, if you want to read a detailed and much deeper review, just continue reading. Martin Tsai said that “12 Rounds 3: Lockdown” lacked the “firepower” of John Cena and I really don’t know what he’s talking about. To some people it seems to prove that no-one is able to reach the acting abilities of John Cena and that “12 Rounds 3: Lockdown” is an instant flop. It’s not really a review but it has got a negative headline and everyone seems to refer to this piece of bad journalism right now. Just hours after “12 Rounds 3: Lockdown” was available, this review was published by Martin Tsai in the Los Angeles Times. Let me write a personal note before I start my review. And I happily invite you to share your thoughts with me. Here is what I have to say about the movie. I got the chance to watch it yesterday, made some notes alongside and my mind up over night. Two days ago 12 Rounds 3: Lockdown was finally available to watch in ten different theatres all over the USA and on demand on iTunes and Amazon. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |